Obama campaign implies that Mitt Romney would not have killed Osama bin Laden

On Friday, April 27, 2012, Washington Post published an article titled "obama campaign implies that Mitt Romney would not have killed Osama bin Laden" 


When George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan last time finally had his chance to get Bin Laden at Tora Bora, he just blinked. Then he put Afghanistan on the back burner and spent the next 5 years invading and occupying Iraq, costing a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives in an attempt to steal their oil. Since Obama took the presidency, he turned the focus from Iraq, but concentrated on Afghanistan, stepping up the drone attacks, all the while being criticized by the cowards in the GOP including Mitt Romney, and managing to capture Bin Laden, who was Number one on the FBI's Most Wanted List and the World's Most Wanted List - they were going to pay $25,000,000 for his capture/kill, which was no big deal compared to the accomplishment. After 2001, no one cared about taking out Osama bin Laden. Failing to capture Osama bin Laden was one of George Bush's greatest failings as president. And that's saying something. I mean it's not like Bush didn't try, right? Didn't Bush look under the table for bin Laden at one of the White House Correspondents' dinners? That was certainly a gold-star effort! It certainly got a big yuck from all the Republicans in the room. So between where Bush failed so miserably, for all the world to see, in capturing Osama bin Laden - even though he and al Qaeda were still out there committing acts of terror - and where Obama succeeded so brilliantly, there is a line of clear demarcation. It's the line between failure (Bush) and success (Obama), and that's what galls the Obama-haters the most is that one of Bush's greatest failings has become one of Obama's greatest achievements. And it's eating away at the Obama-haters like a cancer.